I can see that useless and some other posters have no heart.
No compassion.

For that they can kiss my ass. :shock:

I didn't pick CRE. CRE approved me when others said no.

The others said NO because a misdemeanor being falsely reported as a felony on my DAC.

 

I don't get you don't have a "FELONY" ...But there's one reported to your DAC ...Uh you do know you can dispute the information on your DAC just like you can with any CREDIT reporting agency ? And if this false report of a felony keeps you from being employed you could take legal action against the reporting agency if they don't correct your file after being notified of the problem ,and given proof that the information is FALSE . So if what you say is true the Felony is on your DAC in error you should be able to clear it up ,and have more options than CRE .

 

I would have done whatever necessary to take care of that problem. But surely, any interested company could figure out whether or not the misdemeanor was just that, or truly the falsely reported felony.

No heart... what you were expecting a shoulder to cry on for running two log books, and turning them both in when you got tired of being abused? Do you record the details of driving infractions you commit and turn those into the police, as well? :P

Hope it all turns out alright for ya.

 

WOW! LOL this makes me think I should post my SWIFT experiance! Although a lot of it's Quotes and might get blotted out for language. It's a play by play of exactly what went on while I was out with the guy.

I lasted two weeks and told them to stick that job. In a polite way. I been driving for another company now for 14 months or so and love it.

Good luck!

 

Spencerian, what ended up happening at CRE? Did you go with another trainer or did you go to another company? Hoped it all worked out.

 

Thanks for your NON-NEGATIVE comments.

I faxed in my logs to Salt Lake City. They were very apologetic and promised me they would rectify the situation.

I went back to Hammond Indiana, got another trainer, and finished my 21 days of OTR training. Then I went to Upgrade, passed all tests and am now a CRE employee.

Right now I am on home time. I have 21 days to do as a second seat with a lease operator then I get my own truck.

Some will say that this proves CRE is a bad company. But how many others had less than honest trainers?

I DO like how some blame me for going with CRE and getting a bad trainer. I mean... nooooo it was never HIS fault. It was all me and CR England. Me for choosing CRE, and CRE for being the axis of evil.

 

Oh, so after lining a "trainers" pockets and you on starvation wages.... you're going to spend another three weeks as someones "$$bitch"?? Wow, what a deal...then I guess they are going to introduce you to the "Big Bucks to be made leasing your very own truck......"

Probably quite a few....but then, your question begs a question: That someone else had less than honest trainers, means what???

Yep, sounds about right. I mean...its not as if there weren't ample warnings and flags thrown up....but you, like all the rest of the neophytes who know so much more than anyone else...just run up and jump off the cliff, even though others try to save you the grief..... Actually "bucko", it is your fault, its also the "dirtbag trainer's" fault, and it most certainly is CRE's fault for being a "major-league bottom-feeder".

If you're fishing for "sympathy" its a word that falls in the dictionary between "syphilis" and "sybarite"....

 

I can see that Spencerain is a dammed, bald-faced liar, and for that, he can kiss MY ass :P

In your original posting, ( SEE: I'm Being Trained By Politicians!! ) you made no mention of having a criminal record!! You stated that you chose CRE because they would pay for your training, they were closer to your home, and that other companies were going to make you pay for your meals.

In your "know it all" arrogance, you went on to throw your cyberspace temper-tantrums when other experienced drivers didn't tell you what you wanted to hear!!

You stated that you had never driven a big truck before, and since you were attending a truck driving school where you were "being trained by politicians", you obviously had no prior training, nor did you have a CDL.

Now, you claim that no other company will hire you because you have a falsely reported FELONY on your DAC Report.

Now, here's where you've tripped yourself up, Spencerain!!

If you had no CDL, then you had no DAC report. Other companies couldn't have turned you down because of a felony on your DAC report, because unless you already hold a CDL, there would be no reason for DAC to have anything to report to anyone!!

I hope that you are better at driving a truck than you are at telling lies!! :P

 

Useless.... You beat me to it... I had given some thought to some of the very issues you pointed out... and was waiting to see how much more rope he needed before he really hung himself out to dry.....and you went and beat me to it...

ops: ops: 8) 8) 8)

 

In the interest of factual information. DAC, or USIS as it's now known, is just an information reporting service and yes, you can get a criminal background report on an applicant from DAC even if they have not driven for a trucking company. One has nothing to do with the other, what you CANNOT do is gather previous trucking employment information if the applicant has never driven for a company that reports to DAC.

For instance, if I were to want to run a DAC report on a potential applicant I have to click on the type of reports that I want and will be charged by DAC X amount for each report. Typically these choices are trucking employment history, MVR and what DAC calls a 20/20 criminal history search.