City Driving Logging "Metro"
#11
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Cat, those regs that you are quoting do not really apply in this case since the driver's company is requiring him to keep a log book.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
#12
Originally Posted by Uturn2001
Cat, those regs that you are quoting do not really apply in this case since the driver's company is requiring him to keep a log book.
#13
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,147
Originally Posted by countryhorseman
From my training notes, you are correct - logging such as Indianapolis Metro Area would be acceptable.
Take San Antonio, TX for instance - you may travel through 3 different municipalities all within the loop to get from one-side to the other - we log multiple deliveries as San Antonio Metro Area! Any school that teaches it as a "major metropolitan area" has no support from FMCSA. It is an assumption on their part. As I said earlier in most cases the distance traveled between stops is long enough you could simply not use the muli-stop option. Logging a city such as Indianapolis might be fine, but what about a city such as New York City, Chicago, or Los Angeles? In cities like these you can have hundreds of miles that would include a "major metropolitan area." kc0iv
#14
For your information - this course was taught by a Senior Texas Department of Public Safety Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Officer! It was a multi-level pilot course presented by the State of Texas! Not related to any school or trucking company! So I would believe the man knows what he is talking about!
There is a website, cannot find the link off hand, that gives legal interpretations of FMCSA rulings, and at the time, what I posted fell in line with those! When I get back in this afternoon, I will attempt to find it and post it here! Unfortunately, the program has not received adequate funding and have been shelved for the time being! Hopefully at the next legislative session it will get its funding, and be made available for all Commercial drivers in the state and be a guide for other states.
Originally Posted by kc0iv
Originally Posted by countryhorseman
From my training notes, you are correct - logging such as Indianapolis Metro Area would be acceptable.
Take San Antonio, TX for instance - you may travel through 3 different municipalities all within the loop to get from one-side to the other - we log multiple deliveries as San Antonio Metro Area! Any school that teaches it as a "major metropolitan area" has no support from FMCSA. It is an assumption on their part. As I said earlier in most cases the distance traveled between stops is long enough you could simply not use the muli-stop option. Logging a city such as Indianapolis might be fine, but what about a city such as New York City, Chicago, or Los Angeles? In cities like these you can have hundreds of miles that would include a "major metropolitan area." kc0iv
__________________
"I discover the principles that work and work them, I am forever learning new principles that interaccomodate with what I already know, to the betterment of my life and my world. As principles are revealed to me, I cheerfully record them, use them, and share them. Principles are, without question, the fastest way to what I want." Author Unknown OOIDA
#15
Board Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Enfield CT. USA
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by belpre122
We also received the "gift" of GPS tracking at about the same time, so I am going to assume this might all be related. The "city driving", "metro" methods were so far in the past for me that I am just trying to make sure that I am logging correctly if I use these methods. At this point I have been using traditional logging............................and may stick with it LOL Thanks again.
#16
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,147
Originally Posted by countryhorseman
For your information - this course was taught by a Senior Texas Department of Public Safety Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Officer! It was a multi-level pilot course presented by the State of Texas! Not related to any school or trucking company! So I would believe the man knows what he is talking about!
There is a website, cannot find the link off hand, that gives legal interpretations of FMCSA rulings, and at the time, what I posted fell in line with those! When I get back in this afternoon, I will attempt to find it and post it here! Unfortunately, the program has not received adequate funding and have been shelved for the time being! Hopefully at the next legislative session it will get its funding, and be made available for all Commercial drivers in the state and be a guide for other states. As I said before the FMCSA is silent on this subject. And unless there has been case law any interpretations is just that an interpretation. Have a great day. kc0iv
#17
Manic.....By "GPS", I meant that they had installed the black boxes that send out location/speed etc every 30 seconds. In other words, they installed a little "snitch" under the dashboard. There is no driver interface involved. If they hadn't told me that they were installing it, I would have never known it was even there.
KC0IV.....Yeah, I agree with you on the spotty precedence that I referred to with the whole Rand-McNally reference. Muddy.......for sure. Horseman.......Like you, I remember being trained that way. I look forward to seeing what you find out. Let's see where it goes. Thanks for everybody's input.
#20
Originally Posted by Manicmechnic
Originally Posted by belpre122
We also received the "gift" of GPS tracking at about the same time, so I am going to assume this might all be related. The "city driving", "metro" methods were so far in the past for me that I am just trying to make sure that I am logging correctly if I use these methods. At this point I have been using traditional logging............................and may stick with it LOL Thanks again.
As for multi-stop in a metro area, here is an example of how I do it. I run Columbus,OH once a week with nine stops: Hit first stop and drop to line four. Finish stop and go back to line 3, next stop hit line four and so on. In the remarks I only write Columbs one time. This way I account for all my driving time between stops. If I logged Columbus all on line four and did account for driving, this would throw a speed violation when my company aduits my logs. Is it right? Never had a problem yet and I have been doing multi-stop food deliveries for five years and never got questioned by the DOT at a inspection. |
|