Just an Thought About The Turnover Rate

Thread Tools
  #181  
Old 07-04-2008, 10:37 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,147
Default

Originally Posted by LeBron James
Originally Posted by kc0iv
As your example of LeBron James I suspect it has to do with the NBA being unionized and to be a ball player he is required to be in the union.
No they vote on whether to keep the NBA Player's Association every year. Believe it or not, a union is a very democratic institution. For a couple of years, the NBA Player's Association was actually voted out and the players operated without a contract. This is also true of the NFL and MLB Player's Association as well.

The answer to the question is that these players earning millions see value in having a collective bargaining agreement with the owners. That's the advantage of operating under a legally binding contract - both parties sit down and negotiate a set of written agreements such that neither side can screw the other over.

In trucking, the carriers hold all the cards. They can starve a man out, leave him sitting, roll back pay, play dispatch headgames, etc because the driver's only recourse is to quit or say "that's trucking" and suck up the BS.
From the website: http://www.nbpa.com/cba.php
"A new collective bargaining agreement is negotiated approximately every six years."

"Ultimately, all players vote on whether to accept a collective bargaining agreement."
So if you don't want to be a member of the union but the majority accept the agreement can you NOT pay your dues and still play in the NBA?

And from the website: http://www.nbpa.com/cba_articles/article-I.php
(b) “Agreement” means this Collective Bargaining Agreement entered into as of July 29, 2005.

(v) With respect to the 2010-11 Salary Cap Year, the period July 1, 2010 through July 7, 2010.

(vi) With respect to the 2011-12 Salary Cap Year (if the NBA exercises its option to extend this Agreement pursuant to Article XXXIX), the period July 1, 2011 through July 7, 2011.
Looks like to me it is a 5 year contract with possible extension of one additional year.

Anyone can get a written contract, if he/she is in demand, and you don't have to be in a union to get a contract.

I agree trucking companies hold most of the cards because drivers are not in a position to get a contract unless they are leased to a carrier.

I guess I was lucky I have never had a problem like you describe either as a company driver or as a owner operator.


kc0iv
 
  #182  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:15 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 225
Default

I find it interesting that the thread has taken an anti/pro union twist.

I haven't been approached by any union trying to get me interested. That intrigues me because it seems like we are a very large pool of potential dues payers.

If any company Driver has been approached, please speak up.

To the contrary, company Drivers might be interested to know that a large portion of the warehouse network we deliver to/from were and are being built with union pension money. Has anyone else noticed how much new warehouse space is being built? Anyway, we have a close relationship with the union(s) but no one is trying to sign us up . . and it makes me wonder . .

The Teamsters owned a big chunk of Swift stock. In fact they were suing Swift prior to Moyes, etc, buying the shares back and taking the company private. There has been some speculation that the Teamster suit was the reason . . and it makes me wonder . .

I'm kind of suggesting the mega-carriers may have a "hands off our Drivers" arrangement with the union(s) but who knows? Anything is possible, I guess. At the same time, maybe the unions are in the process of building a nationwide feeder system and, once in place, they'll come knocking on the sleeper to try to sign me up.

If you like the mega carriers being in control, don't do or say anything.

If you want the unions to be in control, give them a call and sign your ass up.

If YOU want to be in control, you're going to have to get active and get the law changed.

Be thankful for your freedom! Have a safe and happy 4th!
 
__________________
Trucking isn't about trucks; it's about Drivers. Up with Drivers and Up with Pay!
  #183  
Old 07-05-2008, 04:13 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by GMAN
According to the ATA there is a driver shortage.
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
I just did a search, and every article about the ATA claiming a driver shortage was from 2005. Do you have access to some more recent documents where they are claiming a shortage?
I believe the last thing I read was last year. I don't recall which magazine. It was also conveyed to me when I spoke with an operations guy from one of the major carriers. Personally, I think much of the shortage comes from drivers moving around from one carrier to another. It is much too easy for drivers to move from one carrier to another. With the current economic slow down any driver shortage would likely not be noticed.

ALL carriers have a more than desired turnover rate.
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
]My turnover rate is 0. I have, however, considered firing myself.
I thought you were leased to Landstar. Landstar has lost over 1,500 Owner Operators so far this year according to one agent with whom I spoke.


There are some ways in which you can get driver pay up. Stick with your carrier for at least a year or two. That will reduce their turnover costs and give you an opportunity to hone your skills. Every time you change jobs you will lose 1-2 weeks income or more. Don't steal from your company. This is wide spread in the industry. Drivers steal fuel, accessories and equipment from their carriers. This also costs carriers money.
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Just like the ghetto attracts a certain type of person to live there, OTR trucking attracts a certain type of person to do the job. If the industry wants to change that, they need to change the working environment and make the job harder to get into. If every Tom, Dick, and Harry couldn't just walk in off the street into a training company, then those companies wouldn't have to deal with those type of people anymore. They would, however, have to raise the working environment and compensation package to attract the elite group they are striving to get. That isn't likely to happen, though, because it would cost the carriers more money than they pay out due to turnover.
I agree that raising the bar for entry would help the entire industry. It would provide a better pool of drivers and would also raise driver wages. By reducing turnover they could afford to pay a higher wage.


When drivers fail to do their job, abandon their equipment, steal fuel or other items from the company they are lowering YOUR pay. These carriers must offset these costs in some manner.
All the problems you listed though are caused by the carriers. If a carrier is actively seeking the type of person who would steal, fail to do their job, abandon their equipement, and quit, they certainly can't whine and complain that those things happen.
So, you are saying that it OK for drivers to STEAL from their employers and ABANDON the equipment that they have been assigned? :roll:
 
  #184  
Old 07-05-2008, 05:23 PM
Guest
Guest
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by kc0iv
A new collective bargaining agreement is negotiated approximately every six years."

"Ultimately, all players vote on whether to accept a collective bargaining agreement."
Although the contracts are often multi-year agreements, there is a provision in every contract that states the union can be decertified at any time during the year. The NFL Player's Association was decertified in 1989 and was re-established in 1993. Yes, it does take a majority vote to do so.

So if you don't want to be a member of the union but the majority accept the agreement can you NOT pay your dues and still play in the NBA?
Yes:

Article V, Section 1: "Every NFL player has the option of joining or not joining the NFLPA"

Anyone can get a written contract, if he/she is in demand, and you don't have to be in a union to get a contract.
OK, then according to that logic why do these players who earn millions and have skills that are obviously in demand agree to join a union and pay dues?

I guess I was lucky I have never had a problem like you describe either as a company driver or as a owner operator.
You either trucked 20-some odd years ago or you just didn't realized you were getting screwed or just went along with the screwing thinking you were making big $$$$.
 
  #185  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:04 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
]My turnover rate is 0. I have, however, considered firing myself.
I thought you were leased to Landstar. Landstar has lost over 1,500 Owner Operators so far this year according to one agent with whom I spoke.
Landstar has no company drivers, so their turnover rate is irrelevant to this discussion. But whoever told you they have lost 1500 drivers is wrong. Their total driver count has remained flat this year.


Originally Posted by GMAN
Originally Posted by GMAN


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
When drivers fail to do their job, abandon their equipment, steal fuel or other items from the company they are lowering YOUR pay. These carriers must offset these costs in some manner.
All the problems you listed though are caused by the carriers. If a carrier is actively seeking the type of person who would steal, fail to do their job, abandon their equipment, and quit, they certainly can't whine and complain that those things happen.
So, you are saying that it OK for drivers to STEAL from their employers and ABANDON the equipment that they have been assigned? :roll:
I think you better read what I wrote again. If you rented a house to a bunch of crack dealers, would you really be justified in complaining that they were dealing crack out of the house? The same applies to companies hiring less than desirable drivers to operate their equipment. If they don't want the problems of dealing with lousy employees, they should pay a rate that will attract better employees, or STFU.
 
  #186  
Old 07-06-2008, 12:17 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,147
Default

Originally Posted by LeBron James
You either trucked 20-some odd years ago or you just didn't realized you were getting screwed or just went along with the screwing thinking you were making big $$$$.
Well the truth is I first drove about 40 years ago got out and got back in about 10 years ago. Then retired about 3 years ago.

As to getting screwed I didn't think I did. Maybe just maybe I alway what a good relationship with my employers. They treated me fairly and I treated them fairly. For sure I got some crappy runs but I also had some sweet runs. On the balance I'd say got many more of the sweet runs.

Did I make the big bucks? I don't know. I have no idea what the big bucks are. I know I made a good living and when I retired I didn't go on welfare.

The thing I have seen the last few years is the attitude of the newer drivers. Then again I don't think it is limited to just drivers seems the people of this generation think the world owes them everything.


kc0iv
 
  #187  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:59 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by GMAN
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
]My turnover rate is 0. I have, however, considered firing myself.
I thought you were leased to Landstar. Landstar has lost over 1,500 Owner Operators so far this year according to one agent with whom I spoke.
Landstar has no company drivers, so their turnover rate is irrelevant to this discussion. But whoever told you they have lost 1500 drivers is wrong. Their total driver count has remained flat this year.


Originally Posted by GMAN
Originally Posted by GMAN

I had an agent and also someone from corporate tell me that they had lost 1,500 owner operators. A friend of mine was told the same thing by a different agent. I don't think all of them are misinformed or lying. There are quite a few owners who lease to Landstar and have a driver in their truck. I used to know one guy who had 16 trucks leased to them. In fact, he is the main reason that I chose to lease to them some years ago.


Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
When drivers fail to do their job, abandon their equipment, steal fuel or other items from the company they are lowering YOUR pay. These carriers must offset these costs in some manner.
All the problems you listed though are caused by the carriers. If a carrier is actively seeking the type of person who would steal, fail to do their job, abandon their equipment, and quit, they certainly can't whine and complain that those things happen.
So, you are saying that it OK for drivers to STEAL from their employers and ABANDON the equipment that they have been assigned? :roll:
I think you better read what I wrote again. If you rented a house to a bunch of crack dealers, would you really be justified in complaining that they were dealing crack out of the house? The same applies to companies hiring less than desirable drivers to operate their equipment. If they don't want the problems of dealing with lousy employees, they should pay a rate that will attract better employees, or STFU.

There isn't a good way for carriers to screen everyone to see who will steal from them or abandon a truck. It is difficult to find this information out unless the driver was charged by a previous action. To say that all problems are the cause of the carrier is as wrong as saying that ALL problems with this industry are caused by the drivers. Neither are true. There are problems on both sides. Not all drivers steal. Not all carriers are bad. There is absolutely NO excuse for someone to steal from the company for whom they work. In fact, I see no reason for anyone to steal. I wish more carriers would prosecute those who steal. Unfortunately, it is sometimes cheaper to simply get rid of the driver than go through the process of filing charges. It has the same effect as an insurance company paying off a claim that they know is wrong, but it is less expensive to pay the claim than take it to court. Rather than steal from his company or abandon a truck the driver should quit. That is the right thing to do.
 
  #188  
Old 07-07-2008, 02:35 AM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
There isn't a good way for carriers to screen everyone to see who will steal from them or abandon a truck. It is difficult to find this information out unless the driver was charged by a previous action. To say that all problems are the cause of the carrier is as wrong as saying that ALL problems with this industry are caused by the drivers. Neither are true. There are problems on both sides.
While I will concede that there problems on both sides, the side that has the ability and need to take action is the CARRIER. The fact that they don't take action causes those bad apples to continue in the industry.

Not all drivers steal. Not all carriers are bad. There is absolutely NO excuse for someone to steal from the company for whom they work. In fact, I see no reason for anyone to steal. I wish more carriers would prosecute those who steal. Unfortunately, it is sometimes cheaper to simply get rid of the driver than go through the process of filing charges.
Many carriers don't even go that far. They let these bad apples mess up time and time again because it is cheaper to fix their mistakes than to put someone else into the truck. When they finally do fire them, they do so quietly.

It has the same effect as an insurance company paying off a claim that they know is wrong, but it is less expensive to pay the claim than take it to court. Rather than steal from his company or abandon a truck the driver should quit. That is the right thing to do.
The right thing to do only applies to the good apples. The bad apples don't give a damn. What the industry needs is more good apples. They will not get them when they are paying substandard wages.

What happens when the airline industry gets a pilot who doesn't cut it? They get fired. Does that pilot immediately go get into another plane and fly for someone else? No. The trucking industry should be no different.
 
  #189  
Old 07-07-2008, 02:37 AM
Snowman7's Avatar
Water Board Administrator
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the Buckeye
Posts: 1,732
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
Unfortunately, it is sometimes cheaper to simply get rid of the driver than go through the process of filing charges. It has the same effect as an insurance company paying off a claim that they know is wrong, but it is less expensive to pay the claim than take it to court. Rather than steal from his company or abandon a truck the driver should quit. That is the right thing to do.
If they abandoned their truck...They're probably not coming in tomorrow GMAN! :lol:
 
  #190  
Old 07-07-2008, 03:01 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by GMAN
There isn't a good way for carriers to screen everyone to see who will steal from them or abandon a truck. It is difficult to find this information out unless the driver was charged by a previous action. To say that all problems are the cause of the carrier is as wrong as saying that ALL problems with this industry are caused by the drivers. Neither are true. There are problems on both sides.
While I will concede that there problems on both sides, the side that has the ability and need to take action is the CARRIER. The fact that they don't take action causes those bad apples to continue in the industry.

Not all drivers steal. Not all carriers are bad. There is absolutely NO excuse for someone to steal from the company for whom they work. In fact, I see no reason for anyone to steal. I wish more carriers would prosecute those who steal. Unfortunately, it is sometimes cheaper to simply get rid of the driver than go through the process of filing charges.
Many carriers don't even go that far. They let these bad apples mess up time and time again because it is cheaper to fix their mistakes than to put someone else into the truck. When they finally do fire them, they do so quietly.

It has the same effect as an insurance company paying off a claim that they know is wrong, but it is less expensive to pay the claim than take it to court. Rather than steal from his company or abandon a truck the driver should quit. That is the right thing to do.
The right thing to do only applies to the good apples. The bad apples don't give a damn. What the industry needs is more good apples. They will not get them when they are paying substandard wages.

What happens when the airline industry gets a pilot who doesn't cut it? They get fired. Does that pilot immediately go get into another plane and fly for someone else? No. The trucking industry should be no different.

It would help if carriers could put more specific information in a DAC report. The way it is now, there is only certain information that can be placed in a driver's report. It is too generic. Carrier's are too afraid of being sued. Some of the carriers just don't want to have to deal with litigation. It makes it more difficult for others to get accurate information. That is one reason some of these bad apples slip through the cracks. They need to make a lot of noise about these drivers. If we could get rid of some of these people it would make it easier to justify paying higher wages.

We do need more good apples. We have some good drivers now. It is a shame that there are so many on the lower end of the performance scale. I don't consider $40-50M+/year as substandard wages. That is a higher wage than most people in this country earn.
 




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM.

Top