Unions - 15 yrs ago did truck drivers have protection?
#13
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 24
unions are a good deal if you are young . in 25 years you will have a pension. some teamster unions are better than others do your home work. you get all the crap runs in crap areas when you first start but as you get seniority you get to pick the better runs . it takes a few years but time goes by fast. i was a teamster for 25 years retired at 44 years old. still have to work but now only part time. i work for a non union company and they treat there drivers very good . but there retirement package is no bargin so you need to look in to that. and they pay by the run or mile as were teamsters pay by the hour + ot. the more reliable you are the better of you will be in a union or non union job in the end .
#14
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
I really don't like unions, I have held both union and non-union positions.
Reason against unions. *Everyone makes the same no matter how well or how poorly a person performs.
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*Unions tend to protect the poor performers the most, which leads everyone to performer less.
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*Everyone must be represented, union reps have the same obligations as defence lawyers
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*No matter how hard the unions try the executive level still ends up making 500+ times the lowest paid person
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*Leads to higher cost of goods and services
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
Reasons for unions.
*Union workers tend to be higher paid
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*Better beneifts
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
*Better vaction time
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
I understand the need for unions, but I just don't think that another Beaurcratic organization is in the best interest of all of us.
I will use the auto industry, because that is what I know best. After all the smoke clears from all of these cut backs, the companies will still not be that much better off. They will only have one place left to look at why they aren't making money. The executive levels. They will not have enough people left to blame it on the lower levels. The Japanese companies are successful, because the execs only make 10 times more than the lowest paid employee on average. US auto execs are making around 530 times more. Japanese companies cut everyone's wages during bad times, not just the bottom tier of the company. They are much more equatable than US companies. What bothers me the most is that the executives are the least loyal. Make one wrong move with them and they quit moving on to the next better offer. The lower level employees are with the company far longer and are far more loyal. I don't just mean the union or blue collar people either. Both lower level Blue and White collar people are much more loyal and tend to hold the companies interest in mind more than the execs. This is just the opposite of what the execs lead us to believe. Just my .02 worth.
__________________
http://www.trukz.com
#15
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Evergreen State
Posts: 160
[quote="ColinThere is far too much divide between the rich and the not so rich. Firefighters and LEOs for example should be paid at least as much as doctors. It's appalling.[/quote]
Colin - I know you're an educated guy, but you must have missed out on many economics classes. Every private sector job in a free market economy like ours is paid EXACTLY what it is worth. The pay level for every job is at the point where demand for the work meets the supply of acceptable labor to do that work. The only exception I'm aware of is the dock workers who have an absolute monopoly (enforced by thuggish & illegal intimidation & violence) on US ports. The pricetag for those 6-figure forklift drivers is an embedded cost on to the products that we receive from oversees. BTW - If you think any corporation is making too much, you need to purchase some stock shares and partake of the "massive profits" :lol: that you presume are flooding in. The NYSE doesn't exclude ANYONE, even truck drivers! :P
#16
Originally Posted by "Colin
There is far too much divide between the rich and the not so rich. Firefighters and LEOs for example should be paid at least as much as doctors. It's appalling.
Originally Posted by NWRally
Colin - I know you're an educated guy, but you must have missed out on many economics classes.
Every private sector job in a free market economy like ours is paid EXACTLY what it is worth. The pay level for every job is at the point where demand for the work meets the supply of acceptable labor to do that work. The only exception I'm aware of is the dock workers who have an absolute monopoly (enforced by thuggish & illegal intimidation & violence) on US ports. The pricetag for those 6-figure forklift drivers is an embedded cost on to the products that we receive from oversees. BTW - If you think any corporation is making too much, you need to purchase some stock shares and partake of the "massive profits" :lol: that you presume are flooding in. The NYSE doesn't exclude ANYONE, even truck drivers! :P Back in 1990, I paid $250 for a Sony 5 disc cd changer. No optical outputs, but a simple remote. Today I can buy a new Sony 5 disc changer with optical output that plays cd-r/rw (extra features, those are) for $99. Imported electronics are cheaper than ever despite thug forklift drivers handling the containers. I pooh pooh on your higher prices comment. If you're referring to cars, that's different. Every model year, cars have more and more technology in them than the previous year. More economical engines, better parts, safety features, etc. It makes sense that more features would cost more the next model year.
__________________
http://www.trukz.com
#17
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,095
I wouldn't exactly say every private sector job is paid exactly what it's worth. If that were the case they wouldn't have minimum wage laws. They wouldn't have overtime laws either nor many other labor laws. We do not have a true free market economy.
#18
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by mi_rookie
I really don't like unions, I have held both union and non-union positions.
Reason against unions. *Everyone makes the same no matter how well or how poorly a person performs. *Unions tend to protect the poor performers the most, which leads everyone to performer less. *Everyone must be represented, union reps have the same obligations as defence lawyers *No matter how hard the unions try the executive level still ends up making 500+ times the lowest paid person *Leads to higher cost of goods and services . I do a run that pay x hours and I can do the run as quick as I want as long as I make my window. A lazy, overpaid, union worker can take 4 hours longer everyday if he wants, hit every stop along the way. We still make the same amount for the run to the penny. How is that person somehow belittling my hard work. He can do his run the way he wants and I can do mine the way I want. His effort has no effect on mine. If the same guy misses windows, he is fired, period, happens all the time. (without good reason, and after a few warnings) Manufacturing companies that hire transportation companies do not care if their employees are union or not and their bid selection does not have different criteria for either type of company. They bid per mile, if my unionized company wins the bid we bid cheaper than another company, period. Difference is I am paid well and my company simply makes less overall profit by sharing with the driver, as opposed to a company that pays it's people peanuts and bids within pennies per mile on the same lanes as my company. All that is great I guess, but apart from the wages, my personal favorite is I bid on my run by seniority. Doesn't matter the guy below me brings management. Try the fruit baskets, chocolate trays, and foot massages, whatever, they do the job I do not want. And I do the job the guys above me didn't want. Refreshingly simple, I love it.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
I don't think you'll ever see unions in a trucking company again. You need the signatures of at least a certain percentage of the drivers before you can form a union. If you did succeed, drivers wages would probably go up and hours of driving would go down. Then your customers would go to another trucking company for a cheaper rate and that would be the end of your union company. Not like the old days when there was only a hand full of different types of businesses that you could mobilize. Much different today.
My guess is that in my lifetime unions will be gone for good.
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 103
USA Walmart Economy
Mythology is mythology, and it's often taught as Economics in university.
I agree with the driver who wrote, "We don't have a free market economy." That is one of those knee-jerk phrases designed to get a knee-jerk reaction. They also say this is a "free" country. But I won't go there! About Walmart, as I see it, they sell SOME goods cheaply, SOME goods at the same price as the competition, and SOME goods higher than we realize. The goods they sell at a real discount SOMETIMES they get from American manufacturers on a special deal where they don't actually pay the manufacturer until months later, so Walmart can leverage their own costs. The manufacturer is so happy to get nationwide distribution, he bends over backwards to make Walmart happy. That's one scenario. Other goods that Walmart sells are imported from China, and they may be assembled by workers in prison, or workers in work camps, who are housed in barracks (i.e. multi-level boxes just big enough to sleep in). Those workers have no expenses and no salaries to speak of. It's a form of modern slavery. Restoring unions is ONE FACET of a whole new approach to life in America, and thoughtful people need to EXIT THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES in droves. |
|