Anyone wanting to buy a truck over the next while...

Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:03 PM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Default

Originally Posted by TK THE TRUCKER
It's a Mack it just has a Kenworth sleeper on it :wink:
poor mack.
 
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


  #22  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:14 PM
TK THE TRUCKER's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Macedon Center,NY
Posts: 1,025
Default

I've never driven a Mack road truck so I couldn't say much about them. The only Macks I drove was in a quarry hauling crushed stone for the asphalt plant when I was 18. I think I have some old pics around here somewhere........
.
 
  #23  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:09 PM
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles - Austin - Houston - Dallas - San Antonio - Laredo
Posts: 191
Default

I can help out with specs, make rpm/mph charts, etc..

Nowadays the wrong specs can cost you 20k a year, easy.

Something as simple as a direct drive vs overdrive, the direct drive tranny can save you 2k a year!

If I was buying a new truck, it would have 2.64 gears, super singles OR XDA "energy" low pro 22.5's, a 10 speed direct drive ultrashift, or maybe volvos I-shift if I was going with a volvo engine.

I talked to a guy running that combo, 12 speed volvo direct drive tranny, and a 485 D13, he said he was getting 7.5 mpg at 60 mph. Almost unheard of with a new 2008 truck!

Anyone that buys a non-aero truck nowadays is nuts.
.... a CPA stated (on this board?) that 72% of owner-operators (probably including motor carriers too) didn't know what they were doing.

If you INCLUDE spec-ing it'll probably raise this to 90%. :sad:

I read of 2.73 rear-end gearing, BUT 2.64? Who manufactures 2.64's?

What do you think about all these aerodynamic items they're experimenting with (walmart, et al - trailer skirts, baby moons, cab extenders, front bumper air dams etc.)?

 
__________________
TruckingInHighGear .com
  #24  
Old 11-23-2007, 12:35 AM
Orangetxguy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,792
Default

Originally Posted by ToxicWaste
And just why do you have a problem with an Olsen truck?? :lol: :lol:
 
__________________
Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! :thumbsup: Star Trek2009
  #25  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:59 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by ToxicWaste
He's getting some good mpg with that thing on his trailer :shock: .
 
  #26  
Old 11-23-2007, 06:47 PM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

Originally Posted by Mandilon
I read of 2.73 rear-end gearing, BUT 2.64? Who manufactures 2.64's?
There's tons of trucks on truckpaper with 2.64's. Every single schneider truck has them. Good gear with 22.5 LP's if you want to run 60-65.

What do you think about all these aerodynamic items they're experimenting with (walmart, et al - trailer skirts, baby moons, cab extenders, front bumper air dams etc.)?
Actually I have some products on my truck. I'll get pictures later, as they're not fully installed. Will reduce trailer gap about 8" at the bottom, and 12" at the top.

Trying to convince my company(99% o/o) to put side skirts on the trailer.
 



Reply Subscribe

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Top