Carrier Trailer Fairings, Allan?
#1
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,095
Carrier Trailer Fairings, Allan?
So again while I was at the Carrier dealer he showed me the brochure for the trailer fairings I think they are made by Freight Wings but they are being sold by Carrier.
They claim a 4% increase in fuel efficiency (6% with gap fairings). It says : At 50 mph and above, tractor-trailer aerodynamics is the most important factor in fuel economy. At 65 mph, over 50% of a truck's fuel is used to overcome drag. Independently verified fuel tests demonstrated 4% fuel savings with belly fairings. At an average fuel consumption rate of 6 mpg, that's a savings of 667 gallons every 100,000 miles. This means a set of belly fairings can pay for itself in less then 100,000 miles. Here's the link for the product http://www.transportparts.carrier.co...I11270,00.html The price installed is about $1700. I'm seriously considering it. Just wanted an opinon. As a matter of fact Allan, the dealer is Canadian and I told him I need to run it by another Canadian Of course all comments are welcome.
#2
Board Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 342
Merrick4 Since this thread is more or less about fuel milage I would like to ask a question . When I was at Mav orientation there was lots of discussions about driving slower to save fuel . I can't remember the actual figures but there was a certain percentage you would supposedly save by driving 62 mph compared to 65 . So my question is do you know if this is true , better yet have you tried different speeds to see
what milage you get at different speeds ? Common sense tells me that driving slower would infact save fuel but I would like to know the actual mpg vs different speeds . :?:
#3
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,095
Actually I don't know Darin. I mean I'm not sure how to do it, that is fill it up and divide by miles all of that. I don't have an on board computer in the dash that tells me of my mpg rate.
All I can say is these big companies do it for a reason. I think one problem I have is I am heavy out of a stopped positioin. Also I was originally taught to downshift a bunch to save on brake use but now I find out that is not good either. BUT I do drive slow and it's not only for fuel efficiency. I had one truck as a company OTR driver. It was set at 70 and I kept the pedal to the floor. Stuff was always going wrong like the fuel injectors. Then I found out you are not supposed to push these trucks. So I go slow primarly to go easy on the truck. You need to baby these things. I'll say one thing, if going slow increases fuel efficiency, then it seems like a lot of people out there don't seem to care. I am not driving the slowest and almost always trucks are blowing by me. And I'm not talking about the company trucks either. My truck can go up to 80 but I think I have ony done that a couple of times. Primarily to get out of the "pack". I didn't know you were with TMC, if I'm not mistaken you are going to haul cars Darin?
#4
Board Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 342
I went to Maverick orientation and was hired but decided I wanted to do my own thing . Yes I am going to haul cars. I am starting out sorta small (4 car hauler )and plan hopefully to move up to 8 to 10 car hauler after a while . I am suppose to have a deal with copart ( salvage car auction ) and was told there was plenty of work fo a four car hauler out of Nashville .
#5
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,095
There is NOTHING like doing your own thing. It isn't always easy, but this has never felt like a "job" to me. I am doing my own thing and it feels great.
I wish you the best of luck and look forward to reading on your progress.
#6
Board Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 342
Thanks Merrick4 . Yep, I have been my own boss for so long ,I can't see
my life any other way. I was looking on the ooida site and ran across an article that said if you were to get just 2 tenths a mile per gallon more on your mpg you would save around $800.00 a year, using 5.5 vs 5.7 mpg. I used the same two mpg and figured the difference based on 100000 miles and came up with around 637 gallons ( much more than $800.00) Not sure when the article was written, could have been when fuel was $1.50 per gallon . Seems to me the fairings are a great idea . Good Luck !
#7
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
There was a test done in Quebec this year and those savings seem about what the test sresults were. If I had vans I would use them.
One company that uses them up here is Robert (yellow Volvos, yellow trailers). They were concerned that they might see some damage this winter. |
|