For the folks that have their own authority....

Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 11-25-2007, 10:06 PM
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 5
Default Dispatch Service

go for it.
 
  #62  
Old 11-25-2007, 10:26 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 725
Default

Originally Posted by Sonny Pruitt
I would charge high because I think a lot of your customers won't have a list of brokers.
And really need your service right away.
You should cater to people who are desperate or don't have a clue
And put a premium on your service
We all know it is impossible to make truck drivers happy
and difficult to make money off a truck driver
(anyone have a shower ticket? etc)
Hit them right away because you have to assume they will be leaving sooner or later.
If I posted I was using a dispatching service
What do you think the advice would be?
Charge high.
GMAN, I'm in agreement with Sonny, charge the high rate. You have a lot of valuable info here so I'm sure that you have the money loads. Dont sell yourself cheap to start this business. Get you a fancy website, place a few ads here and there and you will be turning away business before you know it.
 
  #63  
Old 11-26-2007, 12:31 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default

I spend a lot of time digging up loads that pay enough. If I could bring home the same money and let someone else do the legwork, I'd jump at it. However, you think keeping a solo in good rates is tough...you should try a team :shock:
 
  #64  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:22 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,095
Default

I agree with No_Worries. If I could make the same amount (or obviously more as far as i'm going )and have more time for other things I'd jump at it.

I think what Sonny said about making truck drivers happy impossible is really a true statement for most people in general. Somehow someone is going to screw up a good thing and burn a bridge. I'll never understand it and just to simplify it I just always say that you can't rationalize the irrational. People are their own worst enemy.

Also as someone that just came off one of these dispatch serivces (Hello I'm Merrick and I am a former dispatch service user ) I'd say the one thing that I hated besides the low money was the fact that I felt that this guy put no effort whatsoever into what he was doing. He found me a load and that was it. It was obvious that he didn't care of the rate or anything else.

Now it may not be apparent to someone who may just call GMAN out of an ad he saw, but it's obvious to those here that he puts a lot of effort into answering and helping us here; it really shows. So I'd say even if he put half of the effort into this new business as he does helping people here he will be wildly successful.
 
  #65  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:59 AM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

GMAN I think your percentage idea would work because neither party is obligated to deal with the other in the future. Future dealings would be strictly related to satisfactory pay and performance, on both sides. There's no contract. Both sides have something to lose.
 
  #66  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:08 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mahwah,NJ
Posts: 450
Default

what is more profitable
3 people at 3%
or 1 person at 9%
 
  #67  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:10 AM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

same, but the 1 person is 1/3 the work.
 
  #68  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:51 AM
Guest
Guest
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by allan5oh
same, but the 1 person is 1/3 the work.
GMAN

If you do this let me know because I'd like to be one of your customers after I get back .
 
  #69  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:44 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Thanks for all the feedback, fellas. It is very much appreciated. I will let you know if I decide to proceed, ash_ca_la.
 
  #70  
Old 11-27-2007, 04:29 AM
Orangetxguy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,792
Default

Only thing I can see that needs to be addressed, is G-man getting paid. Now...if all those prospective trucks leased into G...why then he handles all the funds directly and does not need to get anymore authority. If he handles the situation like a brokerage, and receives all the revenues, then sends out checks after his cut, then he would in fact be a broker, and need to set up that authority.

So G would need to make certain that he only signs on those whom he knows are going to send him his percentage, and trust that they will do so in a timely manner. Of course...all those Operators could trust in G, allow him to be the receivables collector, without the brokerage authority, and send them their check every week.

Ain't it fun looking at the business side of life ???
 
__________________
Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! :thumbsup: Star Trek2009




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Top