Stepdeck with a 10" deck hardly clears the mudflaps on a turn

Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-06-2009, 02:41 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default Stepdeck with a 10" deck hardly clears the mudflaps on a turn

Wilson finalized the design of the stepdeck, to be built on July 19th-25th. With a 10' upper deck and 24" kingpin position, it has 76" distance from the kingpin to the front part of the landing gear. They did a weight distribution analysis and said the best fifth wheel position for my truck will be 4" ahead of the center between the drive axles. Now, I measure the distance from the center of the fifth wheel IN THIS POSITION to the farthest point on my mudflap and after 2 measurements on both sides, it's official: the trailer would barely miss the mudflaps on a sharp turn - the truck has 76" from the fifth wheel to its mudlflap. So, either I keep the fifth wheel right between the drive wheels (poor weight distribution), or we move the kingpin (and then have to move the rear axle - to stay 41' compliant), or I get an 11' upper deck. What do you guys think is the best solution?
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos

Last edited by tracer; 07-07-2009 at 01:23 AM.
  #2  
Old 07-06-2009, 02:50 PM
LBF's Avatar
LBF
LBF is offline
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 110
Default

Do you already have the top corner cut away mudflaps installed?
I'm thinking with them that close, you'll tear what you have off somewhere that it is less than flat.
 
__________________
Lightblue Freightshaker :thumbsup:

Ontario, Canada
  #3  
Old 07-06-2009, 03:14 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

the mudlflaps on my truck - since i bought it - had the outside top corner cut off. this should help, i guess. also, their engineer did a quick projection on the computer and it showed the TURNING RADIUS of the trailer's kingpin (with my fifth wheel in the ideal position) was 78 7/16" or 2 7/16" beyond the mudflaps on the truck. It's more than I though initially, but still pretty tight. darn, i should've gone with an 11' upper deck ...
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #4  
Old 07-06-2009, 11:35 PM
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dalzell,S.C.
Posts: 87
Angry Turning radius

I would almost guarantee you'll destroy your mudflaps within a month. Just think of dips going into shippers/recievers not to mention jobsites.

Are you always going to be @ max gross wt. where weight distribution is critical?

How about moving the 5th. wheel slider back so you can slide back of C/L on light loads?
 
__________________
When you're good,your work will brag for you
  #5  
Old 07-07-2009, 12:13 AM
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 175
Default

When i was pulling flats for western express, we had to move the 5th wheel all the way back to make the drop decks miss the mud flaps everytime we pulled one, luckily the way our trucks were set up along with the spread axle on those trailers,weight distribution was never a problem even with rather heavy loads. You will probably need to move that fifth wheel back. Like said above, as long as you are not maxed out on weight every single time you should not have many problemsmspread axles are alot easier to get right than sliding tandems.
 
  #6  
Old 07-07-2009, 01:15 AM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by jagerbomber3.0
When i was pulling flats for western express, we had to move the 5th wheel all the way back to make the drop decks miss the mud flaps everytime we pulled one, luckily the way our trucks were set up along with the spread axle on those trailers,weight distribution was never a problem even with rather heavy loads. You will probably need to move that fifth wheel back. Like said above, as long as you are not maxed out on weight every single time you should not have many problemsmspread axles are alot easier to get right than sliding tandems.
I will have fixed tandems with a 61" spread.
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #7  
Old 07-07-2009, 01:18 AM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by klleetrucking
I would almost guarantee you'll destroy your mudflaps within a month. Just think of dips going into shippers/recievers not to mention jobsites.

Are you always going to be @ max gross wt. where weight distribution is critical?

How about moving the 5th. wheel slider back so you can slide back of C/L on light loads?
what would you say is a safe clearance between the truck's mudflap and the landing gear of a stepdeck trailer? 6 inches? 12? or something else?
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #8  
Old 07-07-2009, 12:57 PM
kelgar50's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 38
Default

Why dont you just make a new mudflap hanger setup.
Take a some 2"x2" square tubing .125 wall and mount it as far forward as you can to the drives without interference and then 45 the ends and mount the flaps to that.You would prolly get by with doing this as you would be moving the flaps forward and lowering them due to the fact the bar would be mounted to the bottom of the frame rails.
 
  #9  
Old 07-07-2009, 09:35 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by kelgar50
Why dont you just make a new mudflap hanger setup.
Take a some 2"x2" square tubing .125 wall and mount it as far forward as you can to the drives without interference and then 45 the ends and mount the flaps to that.You would prolly get by with doing this as you would be moving the flaps forward and lowering them due to the fact the bar would be mounted to the bottom of the frame rails.
that's a good idea, thanks. i saw a couple of trucks with mudlflaps like that. i might do it later on, but for now after lengthy discussions between the trailer dealer, the plant and myself, we agreed to extend the upper deck by 1 foot and leave everything else the same. This will give me enough clearance and I'll still be able to slide the fifth wheel.

The latest spec is:

48' total length
combo composition: steel frame + aluminum
aluminum floor with 4 nailers
steel coil package
11' upper deck
24" kingpin
45" heght from ground to the upper deck
34" height at the lower deck
tandem axles with 17.5" tires, aluminum rims, 61" fixed spread.
31" from the center of the rear axle to the end of the trailer

From my experience, 10 ft upper deck just doesn't work - the landing gear is too close to the truck.
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #10  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:21 AM
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dalzell,S.C.
Posts: 87
Default 48' trailer

Sounds like you're getting it together Tracer.

The only drawback of the 38' bottom is you can't haul a loaded 40' container because of the 2' overhang.

I used to run L.A. a lot and the guys with a 40' lower deck would get out quicker, usually with a 40' high cube.

Just my $.02.
 
__________________
When you're good,your work will brag for you



Reply Subscribe

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Top