Stepdeck with a 10" deck hardly clears the mudflaps on a turn

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 07-08-2009, 04:36 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by klleetrucking
The only drawback of the 38' bottom is you can't haul a loaded 40' container because of the 2' overhang. I used to run L.A. a lot and the guys with a 40' lower deck would get out quicker, usually with a 40' high cube.
Yeah, I know. And now I don't even have 38', it's 37' on the bottom and 11' on top Originally I did want a longer trailer so that I'd have minimum 40' on the lower deck, but then you run into all kind of spec issues. With a 10'1" spread it's bad for Alberta, and if you add a slider it's extra weight and then you have 100 ft overhang So I decided to abide by the KISS principle for my first trailer and make it 11/37. Especially, after I discovered that a Cat motor grader machine is only 33 ft long (I want to focus on machinery and equipment later on).
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #12  
Old 07-09-2009, 11:02 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

A friend of mine had an extension made for his 48' step deck so that he could more easily accommodate a 40' container or other longer cargo on his lower deck.
 
  #13  
Old 07-09-2009, 01:32 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
A friend of mine had an extension made for his 48' step deck so that he could more easily accommodate a 40' container or other longer cargo on his lower deck.
If you extend the trailer beyond 48', then I think it's not going to be legal in California anymore (bridge formula). It's not that I'm planning to run to CA often, but the more versatile my trailer is the better I feel One thing I wanted to add to the trailer was the folding aluminum ramps. Wilson offers a nice design where you practically don't lose any space on the deck when they are fully loaded (they become an extension of the deck's floor). Might do this for my next trailer. Thanks for the info, Gman.
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos
  #14  
Old 07-10-2009, 02:04 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

My friend lives in California. He mostly runs the western states. The short extension should not affect the bridge law. He used it mainly to haul insulation and containers. I think he later took it off the trailer when he went back to hauling cars. It was more for effect to comply with California container hauler laws. A few years ago they passed a law which required anyone who hauled a loaded container to have sufficient deck space to accommodate it without an over hang. As far as I know they still have that law on the books. I have 42' on the lower deck of my step so it isn't an issue for me.
 
  #15  
Old 07-14-2009, 01:42 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Default

Told ya you should've got a 53'. Just kidding lol.
 
  #16  
Old 07-14-2009, 06:35 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by rank
Told ya you should've got a 53'. Just kidding lol.
Maybe next time
 
__________________

Watch my YouTube videos



Reply Subscribe

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Top