T-600s

Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-18-2008, 12:53 PM
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 89
Default T-600s

I drove a t-600 today for the 1st time,,, and well i fell in love,,, it was like a new truck, all tight, and a nice ride over rr tracks was very noticable didnt have the sloppy feel of the 900s ive driven over the years and this truck has 807 thousand miles on it, i was blown away!!!! And it turned so tight im afraid of rear ending my own trailer!!!!

Now here is my problem my buddy and ex boss say they are to light for oilfield support and pulling single and dbl belly dumps in road construction.

Also my buddy says they tend to have over heating problems and break down more often?

2003
475 hp ISX
3:58 ratio
13 speed
$29,500

Need your opinions and advice
Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 01-18-2008, 07:31 PM
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 117
Default

Seems all right to me.
 
  #3  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:31 PM
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
Default

i think that's way too much for those miles, but they're overall good trucks. i see a lot of drivers pulling belly dumps and end dumps and doing general road construction related work with t600s. the key is to get one that is spec'd out properly, and i think if i were you i'd look for somethin with a little bit lower rear end. when it comes to heavy duty oil field work, like moving 100k plus rig sections, you can't beat a mack. they will take a lot of abuse and they dont have complicated suspensions that wear out from heavy duty, off road service. plus, imo, i think they're easier to finds parts for, work on, etc.
 
  #4  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:53 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hinges of HELL!!
Posts: 878
Default

seems like ALOT of miles but the ISX is a GREAT engine. Has there been ANY engine work done yet??

tootie
 
__________________
Never pis$ off anything that can bleed for 5 days without dying.

Adopt a Minpin
minpinrescue.org
  #5  
Old 01-18-2008, 09:43 PM
  #6  
Old 01-18-2008, 10:40 PM
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by tootie04
seems like ALOT of miles but the ISX is a GREAT engine. Has there been ANY engine work done yet??

tootie
Water pump right now, new seat and seamed a lot of air conditioner parts and a blower motor,,, no major engine stuff that i read off,, kinda scary huh! Came from Giltners. I have to say the truck could pass for 300,000 miles truck easy or less.

I can get a 200,000 extended warrenty for 3 grand that covers all lubricated parts , of the engine tran and diffs...
 
  #7  
Old 01-18-2008, 11:41 PM
Bandit102's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 337
Default

I've got 2 '97 models with well over a million on them. They are good, solid trucks. I do not think they break down or run hotter than any other truck out there. They're a damn nice ride. Just no damn headroom or foot room. But that's KW for you.
 
__________________
1999 FL Classic, N14+ 525 hp, RTLO16-9-13A
1997 Van's Aircraft RV-6, IO-360
  #8  
Old 01-19-2008, 02:38 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

I have a 98 T600. Other than dropping a lifter, it has been a good truck. The engine has over 100M on a rebuild. Had the lifters been replaced at the same time I would have saved $7M. Over all it is a good truck. This is the only major problem with it. The lifters is a weak area in the 3406E engines.
 
  #9  
Old 01-19-2008, 09:58 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 603
Default

Originally Posted by tankyanker
i think that's way too much for those miles, but they're overall good trucks. i see a lot of drivers pulling belly dumps and end dumps and doing general road construction related work with t600s. the key is to get one that is spec'd out properly, and i think if i were you i'd look for somethin with a little bit lower rear end. when it comes to heavy duty oil field work, like moving 100k plus rig sections, you can't beat a mack. they will take a lot of abuse and they dont have complicated suspensions that wear out from heavy duty, off road service. plus, imo, i think they're easier to finds parts for, work on, etc.
Are you sure you are not seeing the KW T800?
 
  #10  
Old 01-20-2008, 02:15 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Default

What do they mean by too light? If they mean too light duty....well, we have abused a '95 that we bought in '96 and I have no complaints in that regard. The fairings however ARE light duty.

If they mean it's a light truck, well it kinda is.
 




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Top