Saving fuel
#11
Originally Posted by Maniac
fuel tank size
What does tank capacity have to do with MPG????
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: tidewater area of Virginia
Posts: 178
Been over there on the "snake oil" site. One of the so called tests they pull uses a 1982 Toyota to show how good this stuff is for decreasing emissions. Get real and show me how much improvement using a new modern vehicle.
Seems the garbage haulers spent about $50,000 buying this stuff to improve emissions primarily. While it mentioned that the improvement helped to defray the cost of the product, I couldn't find anything to support the idea they actuall saved money using it. $46 or so to treat $300gl. Hmmmmm... Seems to me the general theme is that it works good on cleaning up and improving milage on older vehicles that should have been put out to pasture in the first place. The more efficient your engine is, the less benifit you'll see.
#13
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
I tried it last night... and it was not that bad at all... you just need to get use to it!
I completed a 500 mile run last night and never went over 65 mph, most of the time it was around 62-63 mph, and even as low as 60 mph. I usally run 70-73 mph on the open highway. My milage is usally around 6,2 mpg average. I average about 3,000 miles per week. I spend about $1,300 in fuel before the FSC, which here in NY is now at $0.025 per mile. This does not include my BT miles which is around 70 miles per day. I couls cut my cost down by buying a "winter rat" car and leaving my truck at our annex. I would save around $150.00 per week in fuel cost. Neckster
#14
Originally Posted by Neckster
I tried it last night... and it was not that bad at all... you just need to get use to it!
I completed a 500 mile run last night and never went over 65 mph, most of the time it was around 62-63 mph, and even as low as 60 mph. I usally run 70-73 mph on the open highway. My milage is usally around 6,2 mpg average. I average about 3,000 miles per week. I spend about $1,300 in fuel before the FSC, which here in NY is now at $0.025 per mile. This does not include my BT miles which is around 70 miles per day. I couls cut my cost down by buying a "winter rat" car and leaving my truck at our annex. I would save around $150.00 per week in fuel cost. Neckster What do you have for gears? Big or small rubber? What is your engine RPM @ 62 mph? What is your engine RPM @ 72 mph? Yeah, looks like you're burning app. 8 gallons/day on a commute?!? x 5 days a week (at least) = 40 gallons... ...abt 175 gals / month Hmmmmm, I don't have a calculator on me... so, I'll say that it's approximately "1 new car payment"... or, abt $450/ month. ...hope I didn't skip a step in that math...
__________________
Bob H
#15
Board Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 252
A friend of mine is the shop manager at a 100 truck outfit. Every time I go in his office he has a new paperweight from some salesman that gave him one for free to try out. If it saves him fuel they'll give him a deal on enough to outfit the rest of the fleet. So far he only has paperweights.
#16
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: over here
Posts: 1,011
beware the turbo wing, if setup properly it`ll help mileage in most cases, but just slap it on and go and you could very well lose mileage.
its basically like an airplane wing, set it up right and you`ll get lift (essentially taking less power to move the vehicle at your desired speed) but set it up wrong and your just adding additional drag.
#17
Originally Posted by brian
beware the turbo wing, if setup properly it`ll help mileage in most cases, but just slap it on and go and you could very well lose mileage.
its basically like an airplane wing, set it up right and you`ll get lift (essentially taking less power to move the vehicle at your desired speed) but set it up wrong and your just adding additional drag. The only thing I don't like about it is the fact that if there is a strong crosswind, I can feel it more. |
|