When are disc brakes going to be the norm?
#11
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Originally Posted by brian
drum brakes can stop just as well as disc brakes
Ever talk to a European driver that comes over here? They bitch about the junky brakes we have all the time. Lack of feel, brake fade, lack of brake power, you name it. The discs dominate the drums in those fields. OK I'll rephrase what I'm saying, a properly designed disc brake owns drum brakes. How many drum brakes do you see on performance vehicles?
#12
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Heres a good article on the NEWER disc brakes:
http://archives.fleetmag.com/publica...?pubId=1&id=49 and some quotes :
The biggest difference between the old brakes and the new DX models, according to Szapacs, is the way the brake actually operates on the slide pins that allow the caliper to slide freely on the rotor.
Szapacs pays more up-front for the air disc brakes, but his trucks have more stopping power and maintenance costs on the DX 195s are, he says, "virtually nonexistent." Most of the units easily go 500,000 miles with no pad replacements or relines, and no rotor issues. Air Products trades its tractors out at 600,000 miles, and it's not uncommon for those trucks to be sold with their original pads and rotors up front.
The "overall design" of discs is definitely better. The problem in the past was with specific designs of the products. Hell, the first cars with EFI were pretty crappy. Funny, I don't see carbs any more.
#13
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Another manufacturer:
http://www.fleetequipmentmag.com/Def...&entry_id=2488
In fact, the company said all-disc truck tractors have consistently shown the ability to stop within today’s regulatory standard for passenger cars.
The impetus behind the NPRM on truck stopping distances is the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999, which was designed to reduce highway fatalities by 50 percent over the following 10-year period. NHTSA believes it can achieve this goal by reducing the tractor stopping distance requirement. Among its findings are that the difference in stopping distances between large trucks and passenger vehicles are a leading factor in the intensity of highway accidents. Currently, FMVSS provisions set the stopping distance for heavy trucks at 355 feet and at 216 feet for passenger vehicles. A 30 percent reduction would lower the heavy truck threshold to 249 feet.
BTW, the "highway cowboys" should note the bolded word in that italicized statement. Not naming ANY names.
#14
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Threes a charm:
http://www.roadstaronline.com/2003/05/050a0305.asp
Also on the panel and giving the fleet perspective was Marty Fletcher, who is technical and training director for US Xpress. He had only good things to say about the 100-truck test with 50 ADB/ECBS tractors and 50 control trucks, with the air discs showing no maintenance issues, improved performance and, at 225,000 to 250,000 miles, only around 25% wear to the brake pads. At that level, they could go to a million miles, he said. However, Fletcher remains guarded. He says he wants to see what happens to braking performance when the pads get beyond 50% worn.
Regulation may be what will drive the use of the ADB - with or without ECBS - here. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is expected to issue a recommended performance rule that would call for 30% shorter stopping distances for heavy trucks by 2007. Today's braking regulation requires heavy vehicles to stop in 355 feet from 60 mph. According to Bendix testing, a typical drum-braked tractor with unbraked control trailer at 56,470 pounds GVW can pull up in about 292 feet, or 17% shorter. That won't be enough to meet the more stringent standard without further development of the basic S-cam brake.
But equipped with the air discs on steer and drive axles, the same rig can stop in 215 feet, or 39% shorter. Not only does that exceed the proposed performance target, but it is actually only about five feet more than a typical passenger car. As Bendix' Bailey points out, if the purpose of the regulation is safety, it makes a lot of sense to regulate trucks and cars to have comparable stopping performance. And while there is no anticipated performance standard at 75 mph, there are plenty of states where trucks run at this speed. The disc brake's improved ability to covert kinetic energy to heat - without fade - is even more obvious here. In the Bendix tests, the drum-braked tractor-trailer stopped in 517 feet while the disc-equipped unit pulled up in 345 feet - just over the length of a football field - maintaining its better than 30% performance improvement and stopping 172 feet shorter.
#15
Originally Posted by Birken Vogt
Well from what I understand they will be coming sooner rather than later with the new stopping distance requirements. I too have heard nothing but bad about them, the various products by all manufacturers. I think that the good old 16.5x7" drums work great but I guess the stopping distance is not where the government wants it to be so we throw cautious driving out the window and replace it with gobs of money. Frustrating
Birken it is frustatating, the manufacturers are forcing this stuff onto the market, there's no money in 16.5 x 7s in anymore... anybody can market that stuff.
__________________
Bob H
#16
[quote="allan5oh"]
Originally Posted by brian
drum brakes can stop just as well as disc brakes
Originally Posted by allan5oh
I see *ZERO* evidence this is correct.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
Even the OEMS say that changing to disc brakes will be mandatory to decrease stopping distances.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
Ever talk to a European driver that comes over here? They bitch about the junky brakes we have all the time. Lack of feel, brake fade, lack of brake power, you name it. The discs dominate the drums in those fields.
OK I'll rephrase what I'm saying, a properly designed disc brake owns drum brakes.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
How many drum brakes do you see on performance vehicles?
__________________
Bob H
#17
Originally Posted by brian
drum brakes can stop just as well as disc brakes
Originally Posted by allan5oh
I see *ZERO* evidence this is correct.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
Even the OEMS say that changing to disc brakes will be mandatory to decrease stopping distances.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
Ever talk to a European driver that comes over here? They bitch about the junky brakes we have all the time. Lack of feel, brake fade, lack of brake power, you name it. The discs dominate the drums in those fields.
OK I'll rephrase what I'm saying, a properly designed disc brake owns drum brakes.
Originally Posted by allan5oh
How many drum brakes do you see on performance vehicles?
__________________
Bob H
#18
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by bob h
nhtsa has already announced that the new stopping distances can be met by drum brake systems...
it is frustatating, the manufacturers are forcing this stuff onto the market, there's no money in 16.5 x 7s in anymore... anybody can market that stuff. That's the way it goes these days it seems.... Birken
#19
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Originally Posted by bob h
nhtsa has already announced that the new stopping distances can be met by drum brake systems...
it is frustatating, the manufacturers are forcing this stuff onto the market, there's no money in 16.5 x 7s in anymore... anybody can market that stuff. - Decreased stopping distances - Increased heat rejection - Decreased fade due to design(a drum expands AWAY from the shoes) - Increased "pedal feel" and sensitivity - Less maintenance, if the system is properly designed What is there to lose? I don't think the manufacturers are forcing this stuff, we'll see what happens. I think we should all at least try driving a full disc truck at some time. There might be quite a few pleasant surprises.
#20
It has been absolutely proved that disc brakes are superior to drum brakes in every way, except for cost. For all of the reasons why Allan said and more.
And the cost of them will certainly come down when they are in mass production. We are going to have Discs on Class 8 vehicles for certain. It is just a matter of time. I am certain that an 18 speed tranny is more expensive than a 5 and 4, that halogen lights are more expensive than standard headlights, that radial tires are more expensive than bias ply. The only reason I did not get them on my tractor, is that that they are not available yet, and there is no where to fix them. I think that those that say they don't want them probably also said they would never buy a touch tone phone, a color TV or get ABS on their car. It is the future. |
|